Generic Community Planning Process Model †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Generic Community Planning Process Model. Answer: Introduction: System thinking is considered to be a multidisciplinary approach that focuses on the constituent of a system which is interrelated over the time within a larger organizational structure. The system thinking approach is considered to be quite different from traditional analysis, which analyses every component of a system by breaking them into independent elements (Haines 2016). This system thinking approach can be implicated in all management field of modern day including economic, medical environment and human resource development alongside with educational system. Unique feature of system thinking is that it can provide special strategy to focus upon interrelationship between different components within a system therefore understanding the relevance of each element within the system. This idea of system thinking can be considered as an essential component in dealing with the challenge of sustainability. With the depletion of natural resources due to over exploitation and increase negative consequences of environmental degradation, most of the modern day business has to maintain the sustainability principles in order to protect the interests of every stakeholder. The sustainability principles are highly important in the global society who are currently facing crisis in both economic and environmental sector. The development of both economy and environment in simultaneous process are considered to be essential feature of advance global society. In the given context the current study will analyze the importance of system thinking in implementing sustainability principles within the modern society. The issue of deforestation will be highlighted alongside, which is another critical factor that is also a major challenge for implementing sustainability principles in mod ern society. According to Xu et al. (2015), the important feature of system thinking is due to its transdisciplinary nature for developing advanced framework and establishing interrelationship. These relationships are generally ignored in the common picture as management theories are implemented in practice. With the approach of system thinking it is possible to develop a common goal for every organizational practice. On the other hand, Mai and Smith (2015), believes that the main unique feature of system thinking is its ability to focus upon individual component within a system rather than establishing interrelationship between different elements. The example of deforestation, which is one of the major issue and challenge for sustainable development practice can be considered to emphasize upon the importance of system thinking in the context of modern day global society. According to Feng et al. (2014), sustainable forest development is an essential Complex system that encompasses the interaction and dynamic development of economy and environment within the society. It can be said that economic development strategies like setting up industries in a nation can have major impact upon the forestry development planning process. This is mainly due to the loss of trees that are caused due to industrial development in the form of deforestation. In order to properly implement the sustainable development strategies it is important to agree upon the Global Forestry Trend and the impact of heavy deforestation that are required for industrial growth. It is important to consider important factors such as forest canopy density, forest degra dation and essential pattern in the process of deforestation that leads to loss of natural resources. These components are highly essential in the system thinking process of economic and environmental development (Feng et al. 2014). Alongside this, another element in the system thinking process of deforestation and environmental growth is the component of global warming and increase level of air pollution. Forest development programmed mainly aims to reduce the total amount of carbon footprint that is emitted due to all modern industrial activities. Few of the essential features of Sustainable forest growth includes considering ecological engineering plan, which can be implicated while developing any modern industry in Forestry area. The component of system thinking along with system dynamics can help to elaborate the ideas of Sustainable forest development alongside with industrial growth by considering and integrating the ideas that are associated with the same. According to Broman and Robrt (2017), the process of systemization is highly essential in context of including system thinking process. It is possible to establish connectivity between different components of forest management with the help of systemization. For example, the loss of large canopy trees within the forest through deforestation can have direct impact upon all small weeds and plants that are an essential component of forest ecosystem. Hence by implementing system thinking process it is possible to better understand the complex ecosystem nature within a forest. The loss of animal Habitat that is associated with deforestation can also be estimated by integrating different components. In case of large tree deforestation, the component and habit at loss can be measured by estimating the total number of animal species, who are currently directly or indirectly associated with the products of large tree (Greenpeace European Unit 2018). It is important to note that every subsystem within the forest ecosystem is not relatively independent but are interdependent on each other for all biological activities. All the components are therefore, directly and indirectly interrelated with dynamic components of biological activities that goes on in a forest ecosystem. Gaziulusoy (2015), has mentioned about the scientific integrity that can identify the hidden interconnection between different components of forest ecosystem. Hence, the system thinking process also considered the scientific factors in order to estimate the loss of the environment that are caused due to high level of deforestation. Implementation of Complex system dynamics and system thinking also involves the component of collecting proper necessary relevant data. This is highly crucial for understanding the context of implementing sustainable development plan of Forestry management and industrial growth. With the help essential data that analyzed through the multidisciplinary nature of system thinking, it is possible to understand the impact of deforestation and industrial growth has on each other on the global society. It is also important to note that different communities within the global society will encounter different impact, which can vary due to their lifestyle habits. For example, deforestation can have detect negative impact on the people residing in rural and tribal regions as they are highly dependent upon natural resources that are obtained from the forests. On the other hand, population residing in the urban region can have indirect impact that may cause due to health issues of increase volume of air pollution. The transparency that can be maintained with the help of system dynamics is another important feature of the same. This method can help in perfect evaluation system that is needed for perfect understanding of the complex dynamics within a system. The main positive impact of higher levels of transparency within the system thinking can be evaluated with the accurate demand levels within the forest ecosystem. The further levels of reliability can be obtained with the transparency. In order to improve upon the value of reliability, it is possible to understand the importance of feasibility of the sustainable developmental plan that is implemented (Popa et al. 2015). For this purpose, it is important to understand the important to understand the operability of the forest management plan. The index system that is another important component of the system critical thinking can help in the process of collecting reliable data from the relevant sources. There are few index systems that failed to provide the higher end learning and information that are needed for better levels of understanding within the system. On the accounts of the index system, it is possible to understand the reliability of the data that are needed to develop a sense of the accuracy that are being included within the system thinking process (Feng et al. 2014). The comparability of the evaluation plan is also needed to better levels of understanding about the system components that are essential part within the system. This is highly essential in comparing the different statistical values that are related with the forestry management system. The different values can help to represent the variation within the reflective practices that are being implemented within the system of forest construction work. Hence, it is essential to compare the different types of indexes that are required for the sustainable development planning. According to Robrt et al. (2017), the flow of information that are mentioned within the system thinking and system flow diagram of the forest sustainable plan strongly suggest that there are essential components of the with the forestry management plan are mutually related with economic growth. Each objective within the forest management plan has unique features for development of both economy and environment within the society. Qualitative assessment is needed for evaluation of each objective that can be assessed depending upon the outcomes of each objective. Hence, it will therefore be possible to implement the components of system thinking that are required to assess the impact of applying the forest management plan upon the economic social development. Use of specific data related to the integrity of the forest management plan is needed for proper scientific evaluation of the forest management plan. Cebrin and Junyent (2015), have mentioned that like any other problem solving approach, the major drawbacks of the system thinking approach is due to its fundamentalist nature. Every kind of business and management related problems are extended that can be a major challenges in the path of high end development. In many cases, there is lack of legitimacy in the matters of problem solving that can even threaten the management solutions in each case. Nevertheless, the system thinking approach is one of the effective ways that can help to diagnose the issues that are considered the major hindrances for the sustainable development (Harvard Business Review 2018). Consumerism is one of the traditional challenges in the path of sustainable development as it stimulates higher levels of production within business. It can also be said that the economic growth and aggressive business activity are the major causes of sustainability challenges. This leads to the aggressive marketing strategies tha t are aimed in convincing the customer for buying certain products. The resource scarcity is one of the major concerns that are associated with all these aggressive business strategies. With the help of the system thinking approach, it is possible to bring about coordination and partnership between the different levels of stakeholders within the business. There are nevertheless, high levels of shortlisted issues that can arise due to the partnership with the diverse group of stakeholders. The chance of facing intense conflict between the different groups of stakeholders due to their difference in the area of interests is intense. Hence, with improper application of the system thinking approach, the risks of organizational conflict is increased (Fiksel et al. 2014). The three parts of the system test can be applied to define the importance of system thinking. The initial primary part the application understands the importance of adopting of the same in the context of the current situation both in the economical and environmental purpose. The second part works to understand the importance and detailed characteristics of each element within the system. The final parts establish the interrelationship between each of the element (Fiksel et al. 2014). The sustainability challenges needs to be dealt with different approaches that are easily approachable by with the interests groups of the stakeholders. Hence, in the concluding note, it can be said that as traditional approach of dealing with the issues of sustainability can cause higher level of challenges. In order to establish inter-relationship between different elements of society, the ideas of systemic thinking approach can be used. In order to deal with the issues of deforestation that is major challenges in the pathway of forestry management, the system thinking approach can help to balance the ideas of economic and environmental development. In spite of its drawbacks due to the increasing risks of conflict with the stakeholders, the systemic thinking approach can attempt to simplify the complex ecosystems that are associated within the forestry management. Essential relevant information can also be judged and evaluated using the quantitative approach. This makes it possible to inter-relate the essential data that are collected from each element within the system. In case of the forestry management, the essential data can he lp to ensure that all the respective stakeholders interest are protected for better level of growth of the global society with sustainability approaches. Reference Broman, G.I. and Robrt, K.H., 2017. A framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.17-31. Cebrin, G. and Junyent, M., 2015. Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachers views. Sustainability, 7(3), pp.2768-2786. Feng, H., Lim, C.W., Chen, L., Zhou, X., Zhou, C. and Lin, Y., 2014. Sustainable deforestation evaluation model and system dynamics analysis. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. Fiksel, J., Bruins, R., Gatchett, A., Gilliland, A. and Ten Brink, M., 2014. The triple value model: a systems approach to sustainable solutions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(4), pp.691-702. Gaziulusoy, A.I., 2015. A critical review of approaches available for design and innovation teams through the perspective of sustainability science and system innovation theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, pp.366-377. Greenpeace European Unit. (2018). NGO statement on deforestation. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/en/Publications/2018/NGO-statement-on-deforestation/ [Accessed 16 Apr. 2018]. Haines, S., 2016. The systems thinking approach to strategic planning and management. CRC Press. Harvard Business Review. (2018). Why Social Ventures Need Systems Thinking. [online] Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-social-ventures-need-systems-thinking [Accessed 16 Apr. 2018]. Mai, T. and Smith, C., 2015. Addressing the threats to tourism sustainability using systems thinking: A case study of Cat Ba Island, Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(10), pp.1504-1528. Popa, F., Guillermin, M. and Dedeurwaerdere, T., 2015. A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, pp.45-56. Robrt, K.H., Born, S., Ny, H. and Broman, G., 2017. A strategic approach to sustainable transport system development-Part 1: attempting a generic community planning process model. Journal of cleaner production, 140, pp.53-61. Xu, L., Marinova, D. and Guo, X., 2015. Resilience thinking: a renewed system approach for sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 10(1), pp.123-138.