Beaumont Community Players Production of Young Frankenstein - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 622 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/04/12 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Frankenstein Essay Did you like this example? My family attended the production of Young Frankenstein, a theatrical performance produced by the Beaumont Community Players in Beaumont, Texas. This theatrical piece was chosen as a critique because the childrens best friend performed in Young Frankenstein. It was an unusual and interesting performance, but this was performed very well by the cast. Young Frankenstein is a theatrical musical based on the Frederick Frankenstein and he is ashamed to be a Frankenstein, insisting that his name to be pronounced Frankenstein and that he is not a madman but, rather, a scientist. He then lectures his students about the greatest mind of science (The Brain). After learning that he has inherited his grandfathers castle in Transylvania, he is forced to resolve the issue of the property. As Elizabeth Benning, Fredericks fiance, sees him off, it is clear that their relationship is far from physical as Elizabeth enumerates all the lustful situations from which she is abstaining (Please Dont Touch Me). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Beaumont Community Players Production of Young Frankenstein" essay for you Create order The set design is extremely effective, and the black cut out background suggests turrets and a lighted outline added another layer. The sky, with stars and moon, is lovely in its simplicity. Lots of lightening adds to the shows gloomy atmospheric feel. From the contemporary but cartoony set to the black-and-white color scheme that encompasses everything. This musical takes a lot of material directly from the movie, and a lot of the humor is sophomoric, but it is deftly delivered. It was one of the best shows ever seen, so funny, the place was screeching with laughter. The cast was fantastic, especially Igor, and the blind hermit, though the housekeeper, the monster, young Frankenstein and his fiance were also brilliant. The family enjoyed it so much, it was so funny, any individual will want a good laugh than this is the show for them to watch, it will be a great evening! The overall rating on the set design was actually pretty good very small mistakes but not noticeable unless an individual is there to critique it. The cast size was around twenty-five people and the costumes were amazing. The family enjoyed how every individual costume was unique, but Elizabeths red dress was very classy and sexy. The other individuals in the play had a mixture of a German Austrian attire, scientific lab coats, and the cool monster costume that was also a hit. Another cast member that stood out was Inga the lab assistant that wore a very sexy and seductive fitted lab coat and dress that could remind an individual of Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz which was very cute. The actors during this performance were hilarious from the start, great singing, dancing and the sets were great. Particularly enjoyed the dancing where the lights flashed, and the dancers were in the air at the moment of the flash. The cast performance was fantastic, especially Igor, and the blind hermit, though the housekeeper, the monster, Young Frankenstein and his fiance were also brilliant. What a great way to adapt the old classic movie. Every bit is enjoyable, great talented artists and excellent transition into musical format. If any individual liked the movie, then do not miss this show. Young Frankenstein was an amazing theatrical show that lasted about 2Â   hours to watch, they family honestly enjoyed every bit of it. The family wasnt sure of the outcome on how it was going to turn out because not knowing much about it and have not seeing the film, but they were pleasantly surprised. The acting was great, the songs were great and the whole show was really funny. Upon leaving my family asked when they could go back to watch it again and indeed, they sure did, the family watched it twice.

The Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki - 1445 Words

On August 6th and 9th two atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The two bombings were the first and only time nuclear weaponry has been used in wartime. These bombs were the first of their kind, developed by the United States, Canada and Great Britain under the research development plan codenamed the ‘Manhattan Project. It is an important issue because there is much controversy over whether or not the atomic bombs should’ve been initially been dropped. Many sides say the bombing was morally wrong because it defied many individual’s human rights, but these people don’t see it was the least violent way to force the Japanese to surrender and bring WW2 to an end. The United States were justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan because it finally spread justice for the Japanese atrocious crimes against humanity in the city of Nanking, China, saved many American, British and Japanese lives, and demonstrated American dom inance over the Soviet Union. Finally, the atomic bombings were an effective and justified way to end WW2 and force Japan surrender In 1937 when the Japanese army took over the Chinese city of Nanking they demonstrated barbaric forms of rape, torture, and murder towards Chinese civilians; which justifies the American retribution for firing the atomic bombs on Japan. Moreover, the Japanese people got quick and painless deaths from the atomic bombs whereas the people of Nanking suffered long and cruel methods of diabolicalShow MoreRelatedAtomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki844 Words   |  4 Pagesdropped atomic bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing nearly 200,000 people. This resulted in Japans surrender in World War II. J. Samuel Walker analyzes this historical event in his book Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs. Over the past 70 years’ extensive research has been conducted and there is an understanding that Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs is inconclusive. It is impossible to determine that the use of the bomb was the quickestRe ad MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1302 Words   |  6 PagesAllies almost one week after being hit with two atomic bombs. On August 6, 1945 during World War II an American B-29 bomber dropped the world s first deployed atomic bomb over the Japanese city Hiroshima, wiping out 90 percent of the city and killing 80,000 people immediately. Three days later a second B-29 dropped another atomic bomb on the Japanese city Nagasaki, killing around 40,000 people. (The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) The Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombings were necessary because it played aRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki884 Words   |  4 PagesFearful cries spread through the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as the atomic bombs were dropped. Thousands of people were killed instantly, with the rest left critically injured. Eventually, it was measured that 135,000 people were killed as a result of these bombs. We know that many people were killed. But how and why were the atomic bo mbs created? Who decided to use them? These questions all contribute to the fact that the atomic bombs impacted the world greatly. It all started when WorldRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay1776 Words   |  8 PagesThe use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II was a controversial decision that was made by President Truman. On August 6, 1945, President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and three days later a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. It brought an end to the bloody war in the Pacific after 4 years. Making Japan surrender in the face of unimaginable force and significant destruction on Japan’s soil. Nevertheless, Truman’s decisionRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1515 Words   |  7 PagesResearch Question: Was it necessary for President Truman to drop the atomic bomb in Japan? Was it necessary for Truman to drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan in World War II? On August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped by a US aircraft on Hiroshima. This atomic bomb was dropped to force Japan into surrender, this bomb alone destroyed Hiroshima and over 90,000 people were instantly killed in the explosion and an additional 100,000 people perished from burns and radiation sickness. Japan refusedRead MoreThe Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki1764 Words   |  8 Pagesmake the decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki however, President Truman was ultimately the man who made the final decision to launch ‘Little Boy’ and destroy Hiroshima, Nagasaki and their civilians, thus forcing an end to the war. Although there were many alternatives presented to President Truman, it is unknown as to whether they would have actually succeeded in ending the war or producing less casualties. Truman made the decision to drop these bombs in the heat of war but h is justificationRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1364 Words   |  6 PagesOn the 6th of August 1945 America dropped the atomic bomb by the name of ‘Little Boy’ dropped by the plane ‘Enola Gay’ on the Japanese city, Hiroshima. Three days later on the 9th of August America dropped another bombed called, ‘Fat Man’ on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. A surrender was received and accepted by America on the 15th of August and the war against Japan had ended. Harry S. Truman, the man responsible for dropping the bombs claims it ended the war more efficiently and was in fact theRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay1570 Words   |  7 PagesDespite the extreme devastation, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. The atomic bomb is a weapon unmatched in warfare, rapidly releasing nuclear energy by fission of atomic nuclei. Desperate times call for desperate measures, which is why America chose to unleash its most deadly weapon, the atomic bomb, on Japan. America, who had already fought in World War II for over four years, had no desire to perpetuate the war. When Japan refused to surrender, America was leftRead MoreAtomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki1074 Words   |  5 PagesThere are many different ways in which WWII could have ended. Rather than taking the risk of dropping atomic bombs on Japan, many people believe that one of the alternative options would have been much more sensible. The variety of possible options the U.S. could have taken to finish the war have been analyzed for years. Though Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki is one of the most controversial and debated topics in history, this researcher believes that he madeRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki1998 Words   |  8 Pagesto drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Joon Jung 2/21/16 Word Count: 1848 Section A: Identification and Evaluation of Sources Research Question: Was it necessary for President Truman to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Was it necessary for Truman to drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan in World War II? On August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped by a US aircraft on Hiroshima. This atomic bomb was dropped to force Japan into surrender, this bomb alone destroyed

Recrystallization and Melting Point Determination Free Essays

string(56) " but those mentioned above are typical solvents to try\." Consider what happens when a solid material is placed in a solvent in which it has a low solubility. Not much! A small fraction of the solid will dissolve, but the rest will just sit there. (Actually, it doesn’t just ‘sit there’ since an equilibrium is in effect, with solid molecules going into solution, and an equivalent number of dissolved molecules reforming solid, but we see the same amount of undissolved material). We will write a custom essay sample on Recrystallization and Melting Point Determination or any similar topic only for you Order Now How can we get the entire solid to dissolve? One way is to heat the solution — most materials are more soluble in hot solvent than in cold. Suppose we heat to the boiling temperature of the solvent (the highest temperature which is practical), and the entire solid goes into solution. If we now let the solution cool, what will happen? Obviously, at some temperature, the concentration of solute will exceed its solubility, and the solid will start to come back out of solution – it will crystallize. By the time we return to the initial temperature, nearly all of the original material has formed crystals, which can be removed from the solvent by filtration. Now, suppose that the original solid contained small amounts of impurities. These would go into solution as well, but since the impurities are present only in small amounts, they remain soluble when the temperature is lowered again. Thus, the crystals, which come out of solution, are more pure than the original sample. This is the essence of purification by recrystallization (Fig. 1). [pic] Figure 1: An impure solid in: (A) cold solvent in which it has low solubility, (B) solvent that has been warmed up to dissolve all of the solid, and (C) solvent that has cooled down to the original temperature. The crystallized solid is now pure, while the impurities remain in solution. Recrystallization Recrystallization is the preferred method for purification of organic solids. The technique can be used for large or small quantities of materials, and is usually very effective and efficient. The most important aspect of the recrystallization technique is the selection of the solvent. A large number of solvents are commonly used for recrystallization of organic compounds. Among these are water, ethanol, ethyl ether, and hexane to name just a few. A solvent, which works beautifully for one recrystallization, may be totally unsuitable for purification of a different compound – the choice for recrystallization solvent is made on a case-by-case basis. This is because of the variation of solubility of different organic compounds in these solvents. We can identify a set of characteristics which are desirable for a recrystallization solvent: 1. The substance to be purified must have a high solubility in the solvent at its boiling point, and a significantly diminished solubility at lower temperatures (limited only by the freezing temperature of the solvent). Obviously, the first part is necessary so that you can get the material into solution, and the second part is required so that the purified compound will come back out of solution. 2. The solvent should dissolve the impurities at all temperatures. Actually, its OK if the impurity dissolves readily or doesn’t dissolve at all, as we’ll see. The important point here is that purification will be accomplished only if the impurities remain in solution as the mixture is cooled. This isn’t too hard to accomplish if the amount of impurity is small. Obviously, it’s a bit more difficult if a large amount of an impurity is present, but if the solubility characteristics of the desired substance are sufficiently different from the impurity, as is often the case, a suitable solvent can usually be found. 3. The solvent must not react with the substance to be purified. It’s hard to get your compound to come back out of solution when it is consumed by a reaction. 4. A reasonably volatile solvent is preferred. This consideration is dictated by the need to ultimately remove traces of solvent from the crystals, and this is most easily accomplished by evaporation, either at room temperature or in an oven. Even with an oven to aid in the drying, only moderate temperatures can be used, since you should stay below the melting temperature of the solid, and definitely below temperatures where the material will decompose. Generally speaking, solvents with boiling temperatures below ~150 °C are OK. 5. Ideally, the solvent should be inexpensive, non-toxic, and non-flammable. These are not absolutely required, but desirable characteristics, which can help to determine the choice of a solvent. Obviously, water is an ideal choice based on these criteria, and is the preferred solvent if it satisfies conditions 1-4. How does one go about choosing the proper solvent? If you are dealing with a known compound, it makes sense to use solvents that have been used before. You can go to the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (printed or online), and frequently a solvent suitable for recrystallization will be indicated. This may show up in two places: First, in the column headed â€Å"color, crystalline form† is often listed the solvent used to obtain the crystals in question. Otherwise, you can move to the columns near the right-hand side of the page, which deal with solubility. The CRC has changed its presentation of solubility data over the years. For this purpose, the older editions (before 1980) are significantly better than the recent ones. Whereas the new editions simply list solvents in which the compound is soluble, the older ones provide more information, which can be useful in selecting a crystallization solvent. Qualitative indicators for solubility in various solvents range from i (insoluble), d (slightly), s (soluble), to v (very). Especially useful is the fact that some solvents are given two listings, one for hot solvent, the other for cold. What if you are working with a brand-new compound, which is often the case? Here, the only thing to do is try different solvents. The choice of solvents is often more art than science – everybody has their personal favorites based on their own experience, but those mentioned above are typical solvents to try. You read "Recrystallization and Melting Point Determination" in category "Papers" A small amount of the solid is placed in a test-tube and a few drops of cold solvent are added. If the solid dissolves, you can forget this solvent – you need low solubility at low temperature. If the solid remains, so far, so good, but this is only the beginning. Now the sample is warmed to the boiling point. If the solid dissolves, things look good. The next test is to let this solution cool, and to see if nice crystals actually form. If they do, you’re in luck. Further tests with this solvent on larger samples of material can then determine whether the desired degree if purification is achieved, and if the loss of material is acceptable. Sometimes, though, no crystals form. This may be a problem with the rate of crystal nucleation – that event where the first few molecules get together to form the growing crystal. A trick which often works in this case is to take a glass rod and rub vigorously the wall of the test-tube just below the solvent surface. Often, this will stimulate crystal formation, presumably because some of the microscopic scratches serve as nucleation sites. Alternatively, the solution can be ‘seeded’ with a few tiny crystals of the substance (if these are available), and then to allow the solution to stand undisturbed until crystal formation is complete. If no crystals form, you must consider the possibility that the substance is too soluble in this solvent, and the fact that it did not dissolve at first may simply be because it dissolves very slowly. If this is the case, it’s back to the drawing board with a new solvent. A not-uncommon result is for the solute to separate from solution as an oil which will not crystallize. This annoying situation arises particularly for low-melting solids and frequently results when the solution becomes saturated at a temperature higher than the melting point of the solute. A remedy which is often effective is to ensure that separation does not occur until the solution has cooled below this melting temperature, either by using more solvent or by switching to a different solvent. Once this is settled, scratching and/or seeding are often helpful for obtaining crystalline product. Quite often, a single solvent which gives suitable results cannot be identified. In such cases, the use of mixed solvents (solvent pair) is often successful. Two solvents are chosen, one which dissolves the substance readily, and another in which the solute is only sparingly soluble. Note that the two solvents must be completely miscible. The usual procedure is to dissolve the crude solid in the better solvent at its boiling point, and to add the weaker solvent dropwise until a faint cloudiness persists, indicating that the solute is starting to come out of solution. A few drops more of the better solvent are then added to put the solute back into solution, and the mixture is allowed to cool to effect crystallization. Typical solvent pairs are water and ethanol, or hexane and benzene, where the ‘weaker’ solvent is listed first. These mixed solvent systems are interesting — it seems that the solubility characteristics of the better solvent dominate at higher temperatures, while the mixture behaves more like the weaker solvent at lower temperatures. Once the crystallization solvent is chosen, consideration can be given to other features of the crystallization process. The idea is to maximize the recovery of purified compound. Enough solvent must be used to keep the impurities in solution, but if an excessive amount of solvent is used, a large part of the desired compound will remain in solution, and the recovery will be low. For this reason, the minimum amount of hot solvent which will dissolve the desired compound should be used. It is possible to further improve the recovery of material by harvesting a ‘second crop’ of crystals. After the purified crystals have been separated by filtration, the filtrate (called the ‘mother liquor’) is concentrated by evaporation of ~1/2 – 2/3 of the solvent. On cooling, more of the compound will crystallize, and this can be isolated by filtration. The purity of these crystals is generally not as good as the original crop, since the concentration of the contaminants in the mother liquor is always increasing. The proper apparatus for recrystallization is the Erlenmeyer flask. A beaker is not appropriate. The shape of the Erlenmeyer flask allows swirling of the mixture without sloshing, and the conical walls tend to condense and return refluxing solvent. The flask should not be overfilled – about 60% of the listed capacity is the maximum, and so the flask volume should be chosen accordingly. Decolorizing a Solution and Hot Filtration Special problems are posed by insoluble impurities and highly colored, resinous contaminants. The best way to remove insoluble material is to filter the hot mixture, while the desired material is dissolved. Insoluble debris will be trapped on the filter paper. The colored, resinous impurities are usually large, relatively polar organic molecules which have a strong tendency to be adsorbed on surfaces. Crystals grown from solutions containing such resins are often discolored by surface contamination by these materials, and it is therefore desirable to also remove them from the solution before recrystallization. They can be taken care of by addition of a small amount of powdered, activated charcoal (Norit ® or Darco ®, also decolorizing carbon) to the hot solution before filtering. Decolorizing carbon has a huge surface area, and readily absorbs the colored impurities. The hot filtration then removes the charcoal; the filtrate, now free of this contamination, is allowed to cool and deposit crystals. The decolorizing/hot filtration procedure requires some care. First, the addition of the powdered charcoal to hot solvent can cause a vigorous foaming which may result in loss of some of the solution. This can be avoided if the hot solution is allowed to cool for 15-20 seconds, and the charcoal is added cautiously. Only a small amount of charcoal is required — add too much and significant amounts of the desired compound will also be absorbed, and low recovery will result. After addition of the charcoal, the mixture should be heated to a gentle boil for a few minutes, to ensure that any compound which might have precipitated during cooling is brought back into solution. Filtration of the hot mixture must be done rapidly to avoid crystallization of material on the filter paper or in the funnel. The setup depicted in Figure 2 shows how the filter can be kept hot during filtration. The speed of filtration is enhanced by the use of a ‘fluted’ filter paper and a stemless funnel. ‘Fluting’ a filter paper is organic chemistry origami and the process is best demonstrated in person. A fluted paper uses the entire surface area of the filter paper, and therefore filters more rapidly than the conventional conical fold. The stem of a funnel is susceptible to clogging by formation of crystals, so a stemless funnel is used. To minimize crystallization in the filter paper it is common to place a small amount of solvent in the receiving flask, and to heat this to boiling during the filtration. The hot vapors help to keep the filter warm. In addition, it is prudent to use about 10% more than the minimum amount of solvent, to account for evaporation during the heating, and to allow for the small amount of cooling which will occur. Finally, the mixture should be poured onto the filter in small portions which will filter within about 30 s, so that excessive cooling does not occur. The [pic] remainder of the mixture is kept heated until it can be poured on the filter. When all of the solvent has been filtered, it is a good idea to rinse the flask and filter with a small portion of fresh, hot solvent (~5 – 10% of the volume already used). This will help to dissolve and pass through the filter any material which has crystallized. The filtrate should be collected in an appropriately sized Erlenmeyer flask. Some crystals may have formed in the flask by the end of the filtration, but these are often very small and not well formed. They should be dissolved by warming the filtrate. The best crystals are obtained by slow cooling without agitation of the solution. Therefore, the filtrate should be placed in a spot where it can remain undisturbed as it cools. The mouth of the flask may be loosely stoppered, but this is normally not necessary. Crystal growth is normally well along by the time the mixture reaches room temperature. Further cooling in an ice-water bath will cause additional crystallization. Crystals come in a variety of shapes and sizes: long needles, blocky prisms, and flat plates are common. Slow crystal growth not only gives the most pleasing display; the product is generally purer. Too-rapid crystallization generally leads to smaller, more poorly formed (and less pure) crystals. pic] Vacuum Filtration Once crystal formation is complete, the product is isolated by vacuum filtration. This technique permits fast and efficient removal of the mother liquor. A special flat-bottomed funnel (a Buchner funnel) is used in conjunction with a heavy-walled Erlenmeyer flask with a sidearm called a filtering flask. The apparatus is illustrated below (Figure 3). A circle of filter paper, small enough to lie completely flat on the perforated base of the Buchner funnel, but large enough to cover all of the holes, is placed in the funnel, and moistened with a small amount of solvent to hold it in place. With the vacuum on, the cold crystallization mixture is poured as rapidly as possible onto the filter paper. It helps to swirl the flask a few times to loosen the crystals, and with a little bit of skill the entire mixture can be deposited on the filter, with only a few stray crystals adhering to the walls of the flask. The mother liquors are rapidly drawn into the filter flask by suction, and the crystals are squeezed dry of solvent by pressing with a clean cork while drawing air through them. Now, this procedure does not remove all of the mother liquor. Invariably, there is a film of solvent coating the surface of the crystals. Since the mother liquor contains impurities, this must be washed away with fresh solvent. The crystals are washed as follows: the suction is stopped and enough fresh, cold (why? ) solvent is added to just cover the crystals in the funnel (this solvent can be used to rinse the last few crystals out of the crystallization flask). The crystals should be stirred gently with a glass rod or a spatula so that all come in contact with the wash liquid, then the vacuum is restarted and the crystals sucked and pressed dry as before. In some cases, it may be necessary to repeat the wash a 2nd time. Air is drawn through the crystals until they are as dry as possible, at which time they are spread on a watch glass for further drying in the air or in an oven. The steps in recrystallization can be summarized: 1. Dissolve the crude material in a minimum amount of hot solvent. 2. Treat with decolorizing charcoal. 3. Filter hot solution to remove charcoal and other insoluble impurities. 4. Cool to effect crystallization 5. Filter crystals, wash to remove adhering mother liquor. 6. Dry crystals to remove last traces of solvent. Melting Point Determination Once we have purified a solid, how do we establish that the product is, in fact, pure? Undoubtedly, the simplest criterion for purity is determination of the melting point, or more accurately, the melting range. Strictly speaking, the melting point is defined as the single temperature at which the vapor pressure of the liquid phase of a compound is equal to the vapor pressure of the solid phase, and so the liquid and solid are in equilibrium. These values are actually rather difficult to measure. Much simpler is the determination of the capillary melting range, which, as the name implies, is the temperature interval over which the compound is found to melt. Since, during the melting process, the system is not at equilibrium, this is not identical to the true melting point, but the values are normally very similar. In fact, most of the ‘melting points’ in the literature are actually capillary melting point ranges. An important distinction is that the latter is always presented as a range of two temperature readings, from the temperature where melting is first observable to that where melting is complete. For pure compounds, complete melting normally occurs over a very narrow range, often How to cite Recrystallization and Melting Point Determination, Papers

Generic Community Planning Process Model †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Generic Community Planning Process Model. Answer: Introduction: System thinking is considered to be a multidisciplinary approach that focuses on the constituent of a system which is interrelated over the time within a larger organizational structure. The system thinking approach is considered to be quite different from traditional analysis, which analyses every component of a system by breaking them into independent elements (Haines 2016). This system thinking approach can be implicated in all management field of modern day including economic, medical environment and human resource development alongside with educational system. Unique feature of system thinking is that it can provide special strategy to focus upon interrelationship between different components within a system therefore understanding the relevance of each element within the system. This idea of system thinking can be considered as an essential component in dealing with the challenge of sustainability. With the depletion of natural resources due to over exploitation and increase negative consequences of environmental degradation, most of the modern day business has to maintain the sustainability principles in order to protect the interests of every stakeholder. The sustainability principles are highly important in the global society who are currently facing crisis in both economic and environmental sector. The development of both economy and environment in simultaneous process are considered to be essential feature of advance global society. In the given context the current study will analyze the importance of system thinking in implementing sustainability principles within the modern society. The issue of deforestation will be highlighted alongside, which is another critical factor that is also a major challenge for implementing sustainability principles in mod ern society. According to Xu et al. (2015), the important feature of system thinking is due to its transdisciplinary nature for developing advanced framework and establishing interrelationship. These relationships are generally ignored in the common picture as management theories are implemented in practice. With the approach of system thinking it is possible to develop a common goal for every organizational practice. On the other hand, Mai and Smith (2015), believes that the main unique feature of system thinking is its ability to focus upon individual component within a system rather than establishing interrelationship between different elements. The example of deforestation, which is one of the major issue and challenge for sustainable development practice can be considered to emphasize upon the importance of system thinking in the context of modern day global society. According to Feng et al. (2014), sustainable forest development is an essential Complex system that encompasses the interaction and dynamic development of economy and environment within the society. It can be said that economic development strategies like setting up industries in a nation can have major impact upon the forestry development planning process. This is mainly due to the loss of trees that are caused due to industrial development in the form of deforestation. In order to properly implement the sustainable development strategies it is important to agree upon the Global Forestry Trend and the impact of heavy deforestation that are required for industrial growth. It is important to consider important factors such as forest canopy density, forest degra dation and essential pattern in the process of deforestation that leads to loss of natural resources. These components are highly essential in the system thinking process of economic and environmental development (Feng et al. 2014). Alongside this, another element in the system thinking process of deforestation and environmental growth is the component of global warming and increase level of air pollution. Forest development programmed mainly aims to reduce the total amount of carbon footprint that is emitted due to all modern industrial activities. Few of the essential features of Sustainable forest growth includes considering ecological engineering plan, which can be implicated while developing any modern industry in Forestry area. The component of system thinking along with system dynamics can help to elaborate the ideas of Sustainable forest development alongside with industrial growth by considering and integrating the ideas that are associated with the same. According to Broman and Robrt (2017), the process of systemization is highly essential in context of including system thinking process. It is possible to establish connectivity between different components of forest management with the help of systemization. For example, the loss of large canopy trees within the forest through deforestation can have direct impact upon all small weeds and plants that are an essential component of forest ecosystem. Hence by implementing system thinking process it is possible to better understand the complex ecosystem nature within a forest. The loss of animal Habitat that is associated with deforestation can also be estimated by integrating different components. In case of large tree deforestation, the component and habit at loss can be measured by estimating the total number of animal species, who are currently directly or indirectly associated with the products of large tree (Greenpeace European Unit 2018). It is important to note that every subsystem within the forest ecosystem is not relatively independent but are interdependent on each other for all biological activities. All the components are therefore, directly and indirectly interrelated with dynamic components of biological activities that goes on in a forest ecosystem. Gaziulusoy (2015), has mentioned about the scientific integrity that can identify the hidden interconnection between different components of forest ecosystem. Hence, the system thinking process also considered the scientific factors in order to estimate the loss of the environment that are caused due to high level of deforestation. Implementation of Complex system dynamics and system thinking also involves the component of collecting proper necessary relevant data. This is highly crucial for understanding the context of implementing sustainable development plan of Forestry management and industrial growth. With the help essential data that analyzed through the multidisciplinary nature of system thinking, it is possible to understand the impact of deforestation and industrial growth has on each other on the global society. It is also important to note that different communities within the global society will encounter different impact, which can vary due to their lifestyle habits. For example, deforestation can have detect negative impact on the people residing in rural and tribal regions as they are highly dependent upon natural resources that are obtained from the forests. On the other hand, population residing in the urban region can have indirect impact that may cause due to health issues of increase volume of air pollution. The transparency that can be maintained with the help of system dynamics is another important feature of the same. This method can help in perfect evaluation system that is needed for perfect understanding of the complex dynamics within a system. The main positive impact of higher levels of transparency within the system thinking can be evaluated with the accurate demand levels within the forest ecosystem. The further levels of reliability can be obtained with the transparency. In order to improve upon the value of reliability, it is possible to understand the importance of feasibility of the sustainable developmental plan that is implemented (Popa et al. 2015). For this purpose, it is important to understand the important to understand the operability of the forest management plan. The index system that is another important component of the system critical thinking can help in the process of collecting reliable data from the relevant sources. There are few index systems that failed to provide the higher end learning and information that are needed for better levels of understanding within the system. On the accounts of the index system, it is possible to understand the reliability of the data that are needed to develop a sense of the accuracy that are being included within the system thinking process (Feng et al. 2014). The comparability of the evaluation plan is also needed to better levels of understanding about the system components that are essential part within the system. This is highly essential in comparing the different statistical values that are related with the forestry management system. The different values can help to represent the variation within the reflective practices that are being implemented within the system of forest construction work. Hence, it is essential to compare the different types of indexes that are required for the sustainable development planning. According to Robrt et al. (2017), the flow of information that are mentioned within the system thinking and system flow diagram of the forest sustainable plan strongly suggest that there are essential components of the with the forestry management plan are mutually related with economic growth. Each objective within the forest management plan has unique features for development of both economy and environment within the society. Qualitative assessment is needed for evaluation of each objective that can be assessed depending upon the outcomes of each objective. Hence, it will therefore be possible to implement the components of system thinking that are required to assess the impact of applying the forest management plan upon the economic social development. Use of specific data related to the integrity of the forest management plan is needed for proper scientific evaluation of the forest management plan. Cebrin and Junyent (2015), have mentioned that like any other problem solving approach, the major drawbacks of the system thinking approach is due to its fundamentalist nature. Every kind of business and management related problems are extended that can be a major challenges in the path of high end development. In many cases, there is lack of legitimacy in the matters of problem solving that can even threaten the management solutions in each case. Nevertheless, the system thinking approach is one of the effective ways that can help to diagnose the issues that are considered the major hindrances for the sustainable development (Harvard Business Review 2018). Consumerism is one of the traditional challenges in the path of sustainable development as it stimulates higher levels of production within business. It can also be said that the economic growth and aggressive business activity are the major causes of sustainability challenges. This leads to the aggressive marketing strategies tha t are aimed in convincing the customer for buying certain products. The resource scarcity is one of the major concerns that are associated with all these aggressive business strategies. With the help of the system thinking approach, it is possible to bring about coordination and partnership between the different levels of stakeholders within the business. There are nevertheless, high levels of shortlisted issues that can arise due to the partnership with the diverse group of stakeholders. The chance of facing intense conflict between the different groups of stakeholders due to their difference in the area of interests is intense. Hence, with improper application of the system thinking approach, the risks of organizational conflict is increased (Fiksel et al. 2014). The three parts of the system test can be applied to define the importance of system thinking. The initial primary part the application understands the importance of adopting of the same in the context of the current situation both in the economical and environmental purpose. The second part works to understand the importance and detailed characteristics of each element within the system. The final parts establish the interrelationship between each of the element (Fiksel et al. 2014). The sustainability challenges needs to be dealt with different approaches that are easily approachable by with the interests groups of the stakeholders. Hence, in the concluding note, it can be said that as traditional approach of dealing with the issues of sustainability can cause higher level of challenges. In order to establish inter-relationship between different elements of society, the ideas of systemic thinking approach can be used. In order to deal with the issues of deforestation that is major challenges in the pathway of forestry management, the system thinking approach can help to balance the ideas of economic and environmental development. In spite of its drawbacks due to the increasing risks of conflict with the stakeholders, the systemic thinking approach can attempt to simplify the complex ecosystems that are associated within the forestry management. Essential relevant information can also be judged and evaluated using the quantitative approach. This makes it possible to inter-relate the essential data that are collected from each element within the system. In case of the forestry management, the essential data can he lp to ensure that all the respective stakeholders interest are protected for better level of growth of the global society with sustainability approaches. Reference Broman, G.I. and Robrt, K.H., 2017. A framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.17-31. Cebrin, G. and Junyent, M., 2015. Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachers views. Sustainability, 7(3), pp.2768-2786. Feng, H., Lim, C.W., Chen, L., Zhou, X., Zhou, C. and Lin, Y., 2014. Sustainable deforestation evaluation model and system dynamics analysis. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. Fiksel, J., Bruins, R., Gatchett, A., Gilliland, A. and Ten Brink, M., 2014. The triple value model: a systems approach to sustainable solutions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(4), pp.691-702. Gaziulusoy, A.I., 2015. A critical review of approaches available for design and innovation teams through the perspective of sustainability science and system innovation theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, pp.366-377. Greenpeace European Unit. (2018). NGO statement on deforestation. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/en/Publications/2018/NGO-statement-on-deforestation/ [Accessed 16 Apr. 2018]. Haines, S., 2016. The systems thinking approach to strategic planning and management. CRC Press. Harvard Business Review. (2018). Why Social Ventures Need Systems Thinking. [online] Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-social-ventures-need-systems-thinking [Accessed 16 Apr. 2018]. Mai, T. and Smith, C., 2015. Addressing the threats to tourism sustainability using systems thinking: A case study of Cat Ba Island, Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(10), pp.1504-1528. Popa, F., Guillermin, M. and Dedeurwaerdere, T., 2015. A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, pp.45-56. Robrt, K.H., Born, S., Ny, H. and Broman, G., 2017. A strategic approach to sustainable transport system development-Part 1: attempting a generic community planning process model. Journal of cleaner production, 140, pp.53-61. Xu, L., Marinova, D. and Guo, X., 2015. Resilience thinking: a renewed system approach for sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 10(1), pp.123-138.